[policy-charter] Proposed charter: Authorization Exchange (AuthZEN) working group

[Michael Jones]

Could that part of the charter then be updated to be clearer about the intent?  I would prefer that it talk about creating OpenID Final Specifications in the working group and then possibly also requesting Publicly Available Submission (PAS) status in ISO and possibly other international standards organizations for those OpenID specifications.

                                                       Thanks,
                                                       -- Mike

From: policy-charter <policy-charter-bounces at lists.openid.net> On Behalf Of David Brossard via policy-charter
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 3:47 PM
To: Policy Charter Mail List <policy-charter at lists.openid.net>
Cc: David Brossard <david.brossard at gmail.com>; openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net
Subject: Re: [policy-charter] Proposed charter: Authorization Exchange (AuthZEN) working group

Yes that is what I recall as well. What we want to do is build Bridges to other standards that are relevant for instance rich authorization requests under oauth or XACML. Or even industry specific standards like fhir.

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023, 3:30 PM Omri Gazitt via policy-charter <policy-charter at lists.openid.net<mailto:policy-charter at lists.openid.net>> wrote:
If I recall correctly, our intent was to standardize within the OpenID Foundation WG, and ultimately have the option to also contribute to other international standards bodies.

Andrew, does this match your recollection?



On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 3:22 PM Michael Jones via policy-charter <policy-charter at lists.openid.net<mailto:policy-charter at lists.openid.net>> wrote:
I’d missed seeing this; it was brought to my attention on a call just now.  This is clearly an important area of work.

The one point in the draft charter that puzzled me was “The WG intends to contribute any developed specifications to international standards development organizations such as ISO/IEC JTC 1, ITU-T, IETF for adoption”.  I’m puzzled because the OIDF is a successful standards body.  Why would we not develop and standardize the specifications within the new OpenID working group, rather than suggesting that other standards bodies do so?

                                                       -- Mike

From: policy-charter <policy-charter-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:policy-charter-bounces at lists.openid.net>> On Behalf Of Gerry Gebel via policy-charter
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 3:56 PM
To: openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>
Cc: Gerry Gebel <gerry at strata.io<mailto:gerry at strata.io>>; Policy Charter Mail List <policy-charter at lists.openid.net<mailto:policy-charter at lists.openid.net>>
Subject: [policy-charter] Proposed charter: Authorization Exchange (AuthZEN) working group

Hello Specifications Council -

Please find attached a charter proposal for the Authorization Exchange (AuthZEN) working group. We look forward to hearing any comments or questions you may have, which you can send to the individual proposers or the policy-charter email list.

Best regards,
Gerry

--
Gerry Gebel
Head of Standards
Strata Identity, Inc.
m 801.556.9994

[https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4x1t52X2alek--dLINNys-EULGTx82o1QIxtZiWijXCmuwz8O7t9gtbqdvtwRYVoKQWus3IfNk]
--
policy-charter mailing list
policy-charter at lists.openid.net<mailto:policy-charter at lists.openid.net>
https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-charter
--
policy-charter mailing list
policy-charter at lists.openid.net<mailto:policy-charter at lists.openid.net>
https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-charter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/policy-charter/attachments/20230929/be6c78d3/attachment-0001.html>