[policy-charter] Updates to the charter doc

[Alex Babeanu]

Hi all,
Couldn't make today's meeting, so I'm not sure if this was discussed. But
just in case...

Given that defining Use-cases and Patterns for AuthZ is part of the scope
of the WG charter, just wanted to remind everyone that we have a draft doc
that goes through these, here :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xf5H2hLSJVa-iRTenwlAlD48dntbL8uuItDQlCIonUI/edit?usp=sharing


Cheers,

./\lex.
--
[image: This is Alexandre Babeanu's card. Their email is alex at 3edges.com.
Their phone number is +1 604 728 8130.]
<https://hihello.me/p/cda689b1-0378-4b9c-88cf-33a9bc8ef0c5>

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 5:36 PM Atul Tulshibagwale via policy-charter <
policy-charter at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> I agree that we should have a broad charter that covers both the areas of
> interest. I have tried to take this view in the changes that I suggested to
> the charter.
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023, 5:32 PM Omri Gazitt via policy-charter <
> policy-charter at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>
>> That is my recollection as well.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 5:11 PM Gerry Gebel <gerry at strata.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Omri, Atul -
>>>
>>> My recollection is that the group was leaning toward one charter for
>>> both workstreams since there is so much overlap in the participants.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gerry
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 4:27 PM Omri Gazitt via policy-charter <
>>> policy-charter at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Atul, I think there are two efforts going on, PDP-PEP and PAP-PDP, with
>>>> two different owners (Andrew Hughes and Gerry).  The meetings that Gerry
>>>> set up were focused on the latter, but I believe we all agreed in the last
>>>> call that we ought to have a single charter with different workstreams,
>>>> since the majority of folks are interested in both.
>>>>
>>>> The charter proposal that both of us commented on is related to the
>>>> former (PDP-PEP).
>>>>
>>>> During tomorrow's meeting, perhaps we should discuss whether we should
>>>> have a single charter, and decide whether we want to have two workstreams
>>>> or one?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Omri.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:38 AM Atul Tulshibagwale via policy-charter <
>>>> policy-charter at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> Someone mentioned to me they didn't know where the charter doc was, so
>>>>> I'm sharing it here:
>>>>>
>>>>>  DRAFT Charter Proposal for PDP-PEP Interoperabi...
>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ijAaymAapYyeV_3qMVjuLtNzoskKsh7R/view?usp=drive_web>
>>>>>
>>>>> Atul
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 3:30 PM Atul Tulshibagwale <atul at sgnl.ai>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> FYI: I've suggested changes to the policy charter doc: i've restated
>>>>>> the purpose and used the alternate suggested name. Also added the AuthZAPI
>>>>>> as a proposed deliverable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Atul
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> policy-charter mailing list
>>>>> policy-charter at lists.openid.net
>>>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-charter
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> policy-charter mailing list
>>>> policy-charter at lists.openid.net
>>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-charter
>>>>
>>> --
>>
>> <http://www.aserto.com/>
>>
>> Omri Gazitt | CEO
>>
>> Aserto <http://www.aserto.com/> Inc. | (425) 765-0079
>> --
>> policy-charter mailing list
>> policy-charter at lists.openid.net
>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-charter
>>
> --
> policy-charter mailing list
> policy-charter at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-charter
>

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments 
hereto, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain 
confidential and/or proprietary information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/policy-charter/attachments/20230810/9f28e774/attachment-0001.html>