[policy-charter] Authorization API Proposal
Alex Babeanu
alex at 3edges.com
Wed Jun 28 16:51:49 UTC 2023
Hi Atul, I'm crafting some feedback on this now, please add me too: GitHub
ID = "baboulebou"
Many thanks,
./\.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 9:50 AM Atul Tulshibagwale via policy-charter <
policy-charter at lists.openid.net> wrote:
> Hi Omri,
> Thanks for your feedback here. I think GitHub issues are a good way to
> provide feedback. I'll be happy to add you as a collaborator in the repo
> (and anyone else who would like to collaborate in updating / editing the
> draft). Please send me your GitHub ID.
>
> Thanks,
> Atul
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:47 PM Omri Gazitt <omri at aserto.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Atul - it's clear you and the SGNL team put some thought into this.
>>
>> I'm still looking through this but I like that you're specifying both a
>> "check" function (Access Evaluation) and an "expand" function (Search
>> API). Both are important, but perhaps only the Access Evaluation API ought
>> to be required.
>>
>> I'm not sure what is the best way to provide feedback. Github issues?
>> PRs? put it in a google doc and use comments?
>>
>> Here are some thoughts (sorry, no particular order):
>>
>> > Policy Distribution Point
>> Nit - this should be "Policy Decision Point" (which you name correctly in
>> other places in the doc)
>>
>> > The Authorization API is itself authorized using OAuth 2.0 ([RFC6749
>> <https://sgnl-ai.github.io/authzapi/#RFC6749>])
>> I think this is overspecified. I can certainly see clients that call an
>> Authorization API using an API key.
>>
>> > Terminology
>> A bit of a quibble, but perhaps we tip the hat to XACML and use the terms
>> "subject" and "resource" instead of "principal" and "asset". I'm not
>> religious about these terms, but "asset" in particular seems less common
>> than "object" or "resource".
>>
>> > Principals
>> In many systems, subjects will be extracted from a JWT "sub" claim, which
>> is a string. I'm not sure that specifying that this must be a JSON
>> structure, and further specifying two optional fields (ipAddress and
>> deviceId) is necessary, and feels overspecified.
>>
>> > Assets
>> Having a type and id makes sense, but could these be specified in a
>> single string? For example, zanzibar defines these as type:id
>>
>> I do like having the ability to pass in properties in addition to the
>> object identifier - but it seems like this should be a json object
>> (key:value pairs), not just an array of attribute names.
>>
>> > Actions
>> It's not clear to me that separating actions into "standard" and "custom"
>> is useful. I think the types of actions you list (CRUD) are common examples
>> but should not be normative.
>>
>> I do think it's possible to use the generic concept of "Action" to
>> encompass permissions and relations.
>>
>> > Queries (as array)
>> I think that allowing a set of decisions to be requested at once is
>> valuable, but IMO the spec should not mandate that implementations must
>> support more than one query at a time. Some PDPs don't support that
>> semantic and it should be considered optional.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 4:38 PM Atul Tulshibagwale via policy-charter <
>> policy-charter at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here's a proposal of an Authorization API that we would like to
>>> contribute to this group (in its current form or if / when we find a home
>>> in a standards body). This is similar to at least a few vendors' current
>>> offerings, so I hope everyone finds this helpful, and we can accelerate our
>>> standardization efforts as a result.
>>>
>>> You can read the proposal in HTML format here:
>>> https://sgnl-ai.github.io/authzapi/
>>>
>>> The sources (under the MIT License) are here:
>>> https://github.com/SGNL-ai/authzapi
>>>
>>> - Atul Tulshibagwale, Erik Gustavson and Marc Jordan
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> <https://sgnl.ai>
>>>
>>> Atul Tulshibagwale
>>>
>>> CTO
>>>
>>> <https://linkedin.com/in/tulshi> <https://twitter.com/zirotrust>
>>> <atul at sgnl.ai>
>>> --
>>> policy-charter mailing list
>>> policy-charter at lists.openid.net
>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-charter
>>>
>> --
> policy-charter mailing list
> policy-charter at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/policy-charter
>
--
[image: This is Alexandre Babeanu's card. Their email is alex at 3edges.com.
Their phone number is +1 604 728 8130.]
<https://hihello.me/p/cda689b1-0378-4b9c-88cf-33a9bc8ef0c5>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments
hereto, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and/or proprietary information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/policy-charter/attachments/20230628/2850f067/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the policy-charter
mailing list