+1<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:04 AM, George Fletcher <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gffletch@aol.com">gffletch@aol.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
+1<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
Allen Tom wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I think that approval by the specs-council should be sufficient without a membership vote to start a WG. Alternatively, if the specs-council does not recommend approval, then the WG proposers could then appeal their case to the full membership.<br>
<br>
Allen<br>
<br>
Nat Sakimura wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Guys: If you think the initial membership voting requirement is an<br>
overkill, please raise your voice. I think this board can act swiftly<br>
to look at it.<br>
<br>
=nat<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
user-experience mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:user-experience@openid.net" target="_blank">user-experience@openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/user-experience" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/user-experience</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
user-experience mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:user-experience@openid.net" target="_blank">user-experience@openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/user-experience" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/user-experience</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>--Breno<br><br>+1 (650) 214-1007 desk<br>+1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central)<br>MTV-41-3 : 383-A <br>PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)<br>