Draft OpenID 2.x User Experience working group charter

jDavid jdavid.net at gmail.com
Wed Jun 2 17:42:31 UTC 2010


If your point is to do with UX, a guideline on contextually appropriate
terms would be useful? (I agree) Is that your point?

'yes'

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt at gmail.com> wrote:

> One would hope that the author of a TOS or any other document will use
> terms appropriate for the audience.
>
> This is the specs list, and we (identity experts) all should know what an
> RP is. I see zero value in renaming it for the spec.
>
> If your point is to do with UX, a guideline on contextually appropriate
> terms would be useful? (I agree) Is that your point?
>
> On 2010-06-02, at 10:01 AM, jDavid wrote:
>
> my point is that if you write up a TOS, or some other specific verbiage you
> are going to right now use the term 'relying party', and until you know the
> details of OpenID, relying party is meaningless.
>
> Facebook uses the term 'partner website'
> http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/108
>
> Let's get simpler, clearer, and more human friendly.
>
> Ubuntu has been doing a great job of cleaning little things like this up.
>  They have set a goal to be easier to use than Mac OSX, it's a lofty goal,
> but it's a good one.  Open Technologies don't need to be complicated to be
> open, let's prove that.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2010-06-02, at 9:22 AM, jDavid wrote:
>>
>> > no, but if i tell my grandma, mom, brother or dad that the relying party
>> is going to do something with her data, what is she to assume?
>>
>> Well, I would be telling them specific sites and not use the term relying
>> party. Similarly I would not be using the term OpenID Provider.
>>
>> >
>> > it's not a good noun.  social app is better but i am sure it's not the
>> best.
>>
>> Do you think that we should only use OpenID for social apps?
>>
>> >  let's just try to find something meaningful.  i also think relying
>> party makes more sense with browser redirects, than with how OpenID could
>> work.
>>
>> If the OP is a server, I don't see how you get away from redirects. I also
>> don't understand why you think that makes more sense.
>>
>> >
>> > 3rd party site would be a more commonly used noun set.
>>
>> Who is the 1st and 2nd party?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> --
> Justin Kruger --
> Unity Technologies ( unity3d.com)
> Social Media Software Engineer -
> San Francisco, CA
>
> http://jDavid.net
> http://twitter.com/jdavid
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jdavid
>
> jDavid.net at gmail.com
>
> jdavid
>
> http://untemplater.com/
> MANIFESTO - "Create True Happiness Living a life that you Consciously
> Choose for Yourself."
>
>
>


-- 
-- 
Justin Kruger --
Unity Technologies ( unity3d.com)
Social Media Software Engineer -
San Francisco, CA

http://jDavid.net
http://twitter.com/jdavid

http://www.linkedin.com/in/jdavid

jDavid.net at gmail.com

jdavid

http://untemplater.com/
MANIFESTO - "Create True Happiness Living a life that you Consciously Choose
for Yourself."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-user-experience/attachments/20100602/8bac611f/attachment.html>


More information about the user-experience mailing list