[step2] OpenID UI Extension - Draft 0.1 (formerly known as the Popup Extension)

Chris Messina chris.messina at gmail.com
Sun Feb 22 07:07:15 UTC 2009


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> wrote:

> The reason why we formed the WG process at OpenID Foundation is to
> keep the IPR clean. Public Comments are OK, but that is something to
> be done long after there has been a Working Group. That is the same
> whether it is W3C or OASIS or OIDF.
>
> WG MUST be made first with the clear IPR statements and commitment
> from the contributors on those IPR requirements.
>
> FYI, OpenID Foundation IPR process is posted here:
> http://openid.net/foundation/intellectual-property/
>
> The "relaxed" way of going around these has been a source of criticism
> from other communities. I would appreciate your cooperation.


I believe that the request to turn this discussion into a WG discussion was
made several days ago.

This is one area where we must make our procedures not impede progress!

Clearly people are excited and want to push this through; while the IPR
concern is a real one, the WG process should not work against getting things
done.

I see that, in order to create a working group [1], there must be a
membership vote of 7 days where at least 20% of the membership votes in
favor of the creation of the group.

It's unclear how we initiate this vote, or if it's already been requested.
Perhaps you could clear this up on the wiki page and also let us know where
we are in the process of creating the WG?

Chris

[1] http://wiki.openid.net/Working-Groups
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-user-experience/attachments/20090221/2f94f9bd/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the user-experience mailing list