Good questions, I entirely agree with you.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:05 PM, SitG Admin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com">sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
3) Now this point may be tough. Why don't we hire a good branding consultant to come up with a name acceptable to all, for OpenID V.Next?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Acceptable to all? You might want a diplomat, not a branding consultant. Besides, why spend money trying to invent a brand name when "OpenID" already has one? Is the anticipated loss of backward-compatibility so certain that v.Next must be distinguished from OpenID by its label?<br>
<br>
-Shade<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://hi.im/santosh">http://hi.im/santosh</a><br><br><br>