Good question. But I don't think the idea of a non browser solution is practical anymore. All the more reason we need to get the browser guys on board.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:21 PM, SitG Admin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com">sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I am beginning to believe that we need get the browser vendors to the OpenID community.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Useful if we're willing to abandon backward-compatibility and insist that everyone using OpenID have a "modern browser" (i.e., developed subsequently to OpenID *specifically to SUPPORT it*), but if we weren't interested in the broadest base of compatible software, why *wouldn't* we go with Weave or some other independent (even non-browser!) application that was developed from the ground up to support "identity"?<br>
<br>
-Shade<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://hi.im/santosh">http://hi.im/santosh</a><br><br><br>