<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Paul E. Jones <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paulej@packetizer.com">paulej@packetizer.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px; color: rgb(31, 73, 125); "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Adding support for email-style addresses is something I like,
but something that can be provided via webfinger. Thus, no change to the
base protocol.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#1F497D" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px;"><br></span></font></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I beg to disagree here. I think the base protocol needs to address the issue of email like identifiers. I would like to see that email like identifiers are valid OpenID claimed id's.</div>
<div>So something like acct:example @ <a href="http://example.com">example.com</a> should be a valid OpenID claimed_id.</div><div><br></div><div>Also this discussion should not be in this thread (about attributes) and maybe someone could start a new thread on this subject.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div>Santosh</div><div><br></div><div> </div></div><a href="http://hi.im/santosh">http://hi.im/santosh</a><br><br><br>