<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I think the premise of <a href="http://axschema.org">axschema.org</a> was to have it be for more than openID.<div><br></div><div>If we want something just for openID we should find a shorter domain and start from scratch under OIDF control. </div><div><br></div><div>Is the goal to be interoperable beyond openID. No is a fine answer. </div><div><br></div><div>If it is no then probably a Kantara work group is the wrong way to go.</div><div><br></div><div>If Dick doesn't mind turning <a href="http://axschema.org">axschema.org</a> into a openID only project then taking it over is possible, but doesn't really get you shorter URLs.</div><div><br></div><div>John B.</div><div><br></div><div><div><div>On 2009-09-17, at 4:48 PM, Allen Tom wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Given that everyone using AX seems to be using <a href="http://axschema.org">axschema.org</a>, we should
just bless it. Perhaps the OIDF should take over running it? We should
try to have an official process (hopefully very lightweight) for adding
new attributes.<br>
<br>
+100 for making the urls shorter, since AX responses usually exceed the
2KB URL limit, and have to be sent via POST, causing UX issues.
(browser warnings if the RP doesn't support HTTPS, an extra "white
page" with the form and the button, JS dependency, etc)<br>
<br>
Allen<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Dick Hardt wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:0535966E-70FC-4DE1-96E5-D9E4538A88B2@microsoft.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><a href="http://axschema.org">axschema.org</a> is shorter then <a href="http://schemas.openid.net">schemas.openid.net</a> and implies the
schemas could be used for things other then OpenID
given that though, I don't have a strong preference
On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use <a href="http://schemas.openid.net">schemas.openid.net</a>.
Is that still the preferred option from your point of view, or do
you see <a href="http://axshema.org">axshema.org</a> continuing in some way?
John B.
On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dick,
That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that anyone else
contributed.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Who controls <a href="http://axschema.org">axschema.org</a> now?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">I do personally
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""> </pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:specs@lists.openid.net">specs@lists.openid.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>