Absolutely. Now if we could only find an OP that actually supports it. (per my thread on the general list) :)<br clear="all">--<br>Andrew Arnott<br>"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:24 PM, SitG Admin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com">sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
If an RP only needs group membership and no individual identity, then why assert an identifier at all? Use OAuth or identity-less OpenID. I think it would seriously cloud OpenID's Identifiers if an AX attribute that may or may not be noticed or included significantly changes what the identifier's significant meaning is.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Good point. Is it possible to do identity-less OpenID without first establishing an identity, though?<br>
<br>
-Shade<br>
</blockquote></div><br>