+1<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Dick Hardt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dick.hardt@gmail.com">dick.hardt@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'd prefer to narrow the scope of the WG and keep it focussed on a small number of goals.<br>
<br>
A separate WG on SREG would be preferred, but I think it is a disservice to the community to have two specs having such significant overlap.<br>
Choice in this case leads to confusion and reluctance to invest. The challenge is that those with an investment in SREG now have a propensity to see it continue on even though intellectually they can see the advantage of a unified spec.<br>
<br>
fwiw: I am in an off-site most of this week and won't be able to engage significantly until next week.<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
-- Dick</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br></div></div></blockquote></div>