<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Come in to PAPE WG! We are a bit lonely right now :-) IMHO, identity assurance is THE THING you need for the RP adoption, and it is important enough for many more people to get involved on the discussion. <br><br>=nat<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.231373); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.231373); ">@Tokyo via iPhone</span></div><div><br>On 2008/09/05, at 11:19, SitG Admin <<a href="mailto:sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com">sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div><a href="http://openid.net/specs/openid-assertion-quality-extension-1_0-03.html"><a href="http://openid.net/specs/openid-assertion-quality-extension-1_0-03.ht">http://openid.net/specs/openid-assertion-quality-extension-1_0-03.ht</a><span></span>ml</a></div>
<div>I'd like to see the 4th draft of this include a "URI level"
authentication property.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I'd like to know whether the OP is asserting that the user
"is a member of Site", "is this specific user *at*
Site", or "is a member of Site and we've generated this
unique Directed Identity for them that won't reveal their userID at
Site but will allow you, the RP, to distinguish between this anonymous
Site user and other anonymous Site users".</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>-Shade</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>specs mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:specs@openid.net">specs@openid.net</a></span><br><span><a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>