<div>Anatoly,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>1.0 was an informal specification, so it was prone to ambiguities. 1.1 solved the majority of these problems, as it is clearer which aspects of the specification are optional and mandatory.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As far as I know, OpenID 1.1 is what all consumers should be supporting at this point.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>John Ehn</div>
<div><a href="http://extremeswank.com">extremeswank.com</a><br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/12/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">techtonik</b> <<a href="mailto:techtonik@php.net">techtonik@php.net</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi.<br><br>What is the difference between OpenID authentication version 1.0 and 1.1?<br>We need some arguments to switch preferable backwards compatibility scheme from 1.0 to 1.1 in Drupal. Looks like there is no way to detect which version of these two is used in case of HTML delegation and this causes problems between Drupal 5 and Blogger, because Drupal chooses 1.0 in this case.<br>
<br>WBR,<br clear="all"><span class="sg"><br>-- <br>--anatoly t. </span><br>_______________________________________________<br>specs mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:specs@openid.net">specs@openid.net</a><br>
<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>