<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Aside from the depth issue, is there any distinction drawn between 301
(permanent) or 302 (temporary) redirects in the OpenID specification? <br>
<br>
David Recordon wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:850CF489-7357-41F6-ACD8-2D7D48FC4C04@sixapart.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Marv,
This has never been specified as a relying party could choose to
follow as many redirects as it wishes. Maybe there should be a hard
line drawn though from an interoperability side?
--David
On Feb 17, 2008, at 3:06 PM, SignpostMarv Martin wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Was talking with keturn in #openid , and it seems that the spec
currently doesn't indicate how 30x redirects should be handled.
More specifically, how deep an OpenID-enabled application should
follow
redirects before giving up.
~ Marv
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:specs@openid.net">specs@openid.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:specs@openid.net">specs@openid.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>