<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: SREG namespace URI rollback</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I'm fine with keeping it 1.0 as Josh proposed.<BR>
<BR>
--David<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Johnny Bufu [<A HREF="mailto:johnny@sxip.com">mailto:johnny@sxip.com</A>]<BR>
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 09:38 PM Pacific Standard Time<BR>
To: Recordon, David<BR>
Cc: Josh Hoyt; OpenID specs list<BR>
Subject: Re: SREG namespace URI rollback<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 2-Apr-07, at 6:06 PM, Recordon, David wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> Sure, though I think there has also been a desire to do a bit of an<BR>
<BR>
Are we in agreement then (about 1.0 and 1.1 sharing the same type URI)?<BR>
<BR>
I went ahead and implemented SREG in openid4java, and exposed it in <BR>
such a way that the users won't have to know about all these v1.0 / <BR>
1.1 details. But in order for that to work and my implementation to <BR>
be compliant, the type URI of SREG 1.1 needs to change as proposed by <BR>
Josh in the next (final?) draft.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
Johnny<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>