Versioning proposal

[Gail Hodges]

Atul

Many thanks for sharing! Glad you are at a stage to dive deeper into the mechanics of versioning.

Mike Jones, Mark H

Can you please kindly review and revert to Atuil and the Shared Signals WG?

I am conscious that there has been considerable work by the two of you and others in order to:

  *   Document the current specification processes
  *   Document the unwritten best practices
  *   Create tools to automate those processes, and pilot the automation tools with the DCP WG
  *   Close gaps in the Process Document via discrete changes, which the Process Subgroup of the Board will present to Board prior to vote by the full membership.

Marie- As Secretary, FYI

Gail

From: Atul Tulshibagwale <atul at sgnl.ai>
Date: Monday, September 25, 2023 at 7:55 PM
To: specs at openid.net <specs at openid.net>
Cc: Gail Hodges <gail at oidf.org>, OpenID RISC List <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>, Tim Cappalli <tim.cappalli at microsoft.com>, Backman, Annabelle <richanna at amazon.com>
Subject: Versioning proposal
Hi all,
In the Shared Signals WG, we recently agreed to this versioning proposal.

[Image removed by sender.] Shared Signals Versioning Proposal<https://docs.google.com/document/d/111yCtaF26tYUwOUM_Wg_896X1sE64PhtxQx8Bie7INU/edit?usp=drive_web>

I'm not sure if the OpenID Foundation has anything it uses across all WGs regarding versioning. Could you please review the versioning proposal and let us know if anything needs to be changed?

Thanks,
Atul
Co-chair, Shared Signals WG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20230926/10970a5d/attachment.html>