[OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

Wed Jul 17 18:30:10 UTC 2013

Tony Tony Tony, how I've missed our time together

The WG's mandate is to profile OIDC to enable an SSO model for native 
mobile applications.

Can you suggest a better (concise & memorable) descriptor for a mail 
list identifier?

paul

On 7/17/13 2:17 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>
> That's a totally useless name
>
> *From:*openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net 
> [mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net] *On Behalf Of *Paul Madsen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:59 AM
> *To:* Mike Jones
> *Cc:* John Bradley; specs at openid.net; John Ehrig; Don Thibeau
> *Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
>
> that list name is fine
>
> thanks
>
> On 7/17/13 1:51 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
>
>     John, are you able to create the new mailing list at
>     lists.openid.net or do we have to ask support at osuosl.org
>     <mailto:support at osuosl.org> for the list creation?
>
>     Paul and other WG creators, what name do you want the list to
>     have?  openid-specs-native-sso?
>
>     -- Mike
>
>     *From:*Don Thibeau [mailto:don at oidf.org]
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:03 AM
>     *To:* Paul Madsen
>     *Cc:* n-sakimura; John Ehrig; openid-specs at lists.openid.net
>     <mailto:openid-specs at lists.openid.net>; John Bradley; Mike Jones
>     *Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
>
>     John Ehrig can set up the web site space and the online Docusign
>     process for IPR collection.  If done right away it saves all
>     concerned lots of time and hassle.
>
>     Don Thibeau
>
>     The OpenID Foundation <http://openid.net>
>
>     On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Paul Madsen wrote:
>
>
>
>
>     Thanks Nat,
>
>     Don, can you direct me to whomever I should work with on the WG
>     list & page logistics?
>
>     Paul
>
>     On 7/16/13 6:08 AM, n-sakimura wrote:
>
>         The WG formation is deemed to be approved per section 4.2 of
>         the OpenID Process Document v.1.5 of 2009.
>
>         A new mailing list should be established promptly per section
>         4.3 of the above document. Also, a WG web pages should be set
>         up at openid.net <http://openid.net>. You should also ask the
>         secretary of the foundation to announce the first meeting of
>         the WG, in which scope approval and the chairs selection
>         should be done.
>
>         Note: the first meeting can only be done after the WG has
>         collected the IPR agreement from the participants, so it may
>         not be as quick as you may wish, but it has to be done. BTW,
>         NRI's agreement is already in as we have a blanket agreement
>         like Google.
>
>         Nat
>
>         (2013/07/15 14:56), Paul Madsen wrote:
>
>
>         Next steps?
>
>         -----------
>         Paul Madsen
>         Ping Identity
>
>         Anthony Nadalin<tonynad at microsoft.com>
>         <mailto:tonynad at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>         I believe if you dig you will see that there is potential for
>         IPR from both Apple and Facebook.
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net
>         <mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net>
>         [mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of
>         n-sakimura
>         Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:20 PM
>         To: openid-specs at lists.openid.net
>         <mailto:openid-specs at lists.openid.net>
>         Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
>
>         Could you kindly spell it out?
>
>          From what I have been hearing, Facebook was just using fast
>         application switch, which is nothing more than Self-issued
>         thing that we have, and iOS's native login support given to
>         facebook, twitter, and Weibo.
>         Perhaps you are thinking of something else.
>
>         Of course, I could be complete wrong. I should probably read
>         https://developers.facebook.com/docs/howtos/ios-6/
>         and
>
>         http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233
>
>
>         as well.
>
>         Having said that, if Apple's interface is not open, perhaps it
>         is a task for an industry consortia like OpenID Foundation to
>         go and ask Apple to open up the API for other IdPs as well. Do
>         not know if they are going to listen, but still, it might be
>         our duty to try.
>
>         Nat
>
>         (2013/07/04 7:30), Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>
>
>         I also have a concern that we might be infringing on the
>         Facebook SSO
>         (iOS) IPR with this effort.
>
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         Nat Sakimura (n-sakimura at nri.co.jp <mailto:n-sakimura at nri.co.jp>)
>         Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
>         Tel:+81-3-6274-1412 <tel:+81-3-6274-1412> Fax:+81-3-6274-1547
>
>         PLEASE READ:
>         The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
>         intended for the named recipient(s) only.
>         If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are
>         hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution
>         or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
>         have received this message in error, please notify the sender
>         immediately and delete your copy from your system.
>         _______________________________________________
>         specs mailing list
>         specs at lists.openid.net <mailto:specs at lists.openid.net>
>         http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         specs mailing list
>         specs at lists.openid.net <mailto:specs at lists.openid.net>
>         http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20130717/a5db2ffa/attachment-0001.html>