[OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

Paul Madsen paulmadsen at rogers.com
Wed Jul 17 17:59:05 UTC 2013


that list name is fine

thanks

On 7/17/13 1:51 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
>
> John, are you able to create the new mailing list at lists.openid.net 
> or do we have to ask support at osuosl.org <mailto:support at osuosl.org> 
> for the list creation?
>
> Paul and other WG creators, what name do you want the list to have?  
> openid-specs-native-sso?
>
> -- Mike
>
> *From:*Don Thibeau [mailto:don at oidf.org]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:03 AM
> *To:* Paul Madsen
> *Cc:* n-sakimura; John Ehrig; openid-specs at lists.openid.net; John 
> Bradley; Mike Jones
> *Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
>
> John Ehrig can set up the web site space and the online Docusign 
> process for IPR collection.  If done right away it saves all concerned 
> lots of time and hassle.
>
> Don Thibeau
>
> The OpenID Foundation <http://openid.net>
>
> On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Paul Madsen wrote:
>
>
>
> Thanks Nat,
>
> Don, can you direct me to whomever I should work with on the WG list & 
> page logistics?
>
> Paul
>
> On 7/16/13 6:08 AM, n-sakimura wrote:
>
>     The WG formation is deemed to be approved per section 4.2 of the
>     OpenID Process Document v.1.5 of 2009.
>
>     A new mailing list should be established promptly per section 4.3
>     of the above document. Also, a WG web pages should be set up at
>     openid.net <http://openid.net>. You should also ask the secretary
>     of the foundation to announce the first meeting of the WG, in
>     which scope approval and the chairs selection should be done.
>
>     Note: the first meeting can only be done after the WG has
>     collected the IPR agreement from the participants, so it may not
>     be as quick as you may wish, but it has to be done. BTW, NRI's
>     agreement is already in as we have a blanket agreement like Google.
>
>     Nat
>
>     (2013/07/15 14:56), Paul Madsen wrote:
>
>     Next steps?
>
>     -----------
>     Paul Madsen
>     Ping Identity
>
>     Anthony Nadalin<tonynad at microsoft.com>
>     <mailto:tonynad at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>
>     I believe if you dig you will see that there is potential for IPR
>     from both Apple and Facebook.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net
>     <mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net>
>     [mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of
>     n-sakimura
>     Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:20 PM
>     To: openid-specs at lists.openid.net
>     <mailto:openid-specs at lists.openid.net>
>     Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
>
>     Could you kindly spell it out?
>
>      From what I have been hearing, Facebook was just using fast
>     application switch, which is nothing more than Self-issued thing
>     that we have, and iOS's native login support given to facebook,
>     twitter, and Weibo.
>     Perhaps you are thinking of something else.
>
>     Of course, I could be complete wrong. I should probably read
>     https://developers.facebook.com/docs/howtos/ios-6/
>     and
>
>     http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233
>
>
>     as well.
>
>     Having said that, if Apple's interface is not open, perhaps it is
>     a task for an industry consortia like OpenID Foundation to go and
>     ask Apple to open up the API for other IdPs as well. Do not know
>     if they are going to listen, but still, it might be our duty to try.
>
>     Nat
>
>     (2013/07/04 7:30), Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>
>     I also have a concern that we might be infringing on the Facebook SSO
>     (iOS) IPR with this effort.
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Nat Sakimura (n-sakimura at nri.co.jp <mailto:n-sakimura at nri.co.jp>)
>     Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
>     Tel:+81-3-6274-1412 <tel:+81-3-6274-1412> Fax:+81-3-6274-1547
>
>     PLEASE READ:
>     The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
>     intended for the named recipient(s) only.
>     If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are
>     hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
>     duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
>     received this message in error, please notify the sender
>     immediately and delete your copy from your system.
>     _______________________________________________
>     specs mailing list
>     specs at lists.openid.net <mailto:specs at lists.openid.net>
>     http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     specs mailing list
>     specs at lists.openid.net <mailto:specs at lists.openid.net>
>     http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20130717/9717a57e/attachment.html>


More information about the specs mailing list