[OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

Paul Madsen paulmadsen at rogers.com
Wed Jul 17 11:59:55 UTC 2013


Thanks Nat,

Don, can you direct me to whomever I should work with on the WG list & 
page logistics?

Paul

On 7/16/13 6:08 AM, n-sakimura wrote:
> The WG formation is deemed to be approved per section 4.2 of the 
> OpenID Process Document v.1.5 of 2009.
>
> A new mailing list should be established promptly per section 4.3 of 
> the above document. Also, a WG web pages should be set up at 
> openid.net. You should also ask the secretary of the foundation to 
> announce the first meeting of the WG, in which scope approval and the 
> chairs selection should be done.
>
> Note: the first meeting can only be done after the WG has collected 
> the IPR agreement from the participants, so it may not be as quick as 
> you may wish, but it has to be done. BTW, NRI's agreement is already 
> in as we have a blanket agreement like Google.
>
> Nat
>
> (2013/07/15 14:56), Paul Madsen wrote:
>> Next steps?
>>
>> -----------
>> Paul Madsen
>> Ping Identity
>>
>> Anthony Nadalin<tonynad at microsoft.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> I believe if you dig you will see that there is potential for IPR 
>>> from both Apple and Facebook.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net 
>>> [mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of n-sakimura
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:20 PM
>>> To: openid-specs at lists.openid.net
>>> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
>>>
>>> Could you kindly spell it out?
>>>
>>>  From what I have been hearing, Facebook was just using fast 
>>> application switch, which is nothing more than Self-issued thing 
>>> that we have, and iOS's native login support given to facebook, 
>>> twitter, and Weibo.
>>> Perhaps you are thinking of something else.
>>>
>>> Of course, I could be complete wrong. I should probably read
>>>     https://developers.facebook.com/docs/howtos/ios-6/
>>> and
>>>
>>> http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233 
>>>
>>>
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> Having said that, if Apple's interface is not open, perhaps it is a 
>>> task for an industry consortia like OpenID Foundation to go and ask 
>>> Apple to open up the API for other IdPs as well. Do not know if they 
>>> are going to listen, but still, it might be our duty to try.
>>>
>>> Nat
>>>
>>> (2013/07/04 7:30), Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>>>> I also have a concern that we might be infringing on the Facebook SSO
>>>> (iOS) IPR with this effort.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Nat Sakimura (n-sakimura at nri.co.jp)
>>> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
>>> Tel:+81-3-6274-1412 Fax:+81-3-6274-1547
>>>
>>> PLEASE READ:
>>> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and 
>>> intended for the named recipient(s) only.
>>> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby 
>>> notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication 
>>> of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
>>> message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
>>> your copy from your system.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> specs mailing list
>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> specs mailing list
>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20130717/c5b754d5/attachment.html>


More information about the specs mailing list