Charter submission for Account Chooser Working Group

[Anthony Nadalin]

As I indicated before, would like to see the server side be included in the scope, we want this to be successful and not go into the failure points that cardspace did. Without the server side I believe that this will not be as successful and as interoperable as needed

From: Eric Sachs [mailto:esachs at google.com]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 2:16 PM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: Mike Jones; Christopher Messina; John Bradley; OpenID Specs Mailing List; Chuck Sievert; Basheer Tome; Kevin Long; Andrew Dahley; Don Thibeau; Wei Tu
Subject: Re: Charter submission for Account Chooser Working Group

Thanks to everyone on the specs council who provided feedback.

By default the proposal becomes "deemed accepted" tomorrow which is 15 days after submission.  A mailing list has been created for the new working group
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ac
I had planned on announcing the mailing list at the OpenID Summit tomorrow at the account chooser session.

If anyone has any final feedback on the charter before such an announcement, feel free to grab me at the OpenID Summit today if you are in attendance, or just post email to this thread.

According to the OIDF Process Document<http://openid.net/wordpress-content/uploads/2010/01/OpenID_Process_Document_December_2009_Final_Approved.pdf> "the first obligation of a new WG is to establish and approve its Scope, which should broadly describe the outer limits of the WG's work."  A number of the comments from the spec council were about the scope, so once we get a good sized group on the mailing list I am going to summarize some of that council feedback to see if we can attract more participants to expand the scope.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20110912/ff5f0d09/attachment.html>