Draft charter for v.Next Attributes working group

[Santosh Rajan]

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Paul E. Jones <paulej at packetizer.com>wrote:

>
>
> Adding support for email-style addresses is something I like, but something
> that can be provided via webfinger.  Thus, no change to the base protocol.
>
>
>
I beg to disagree here. I think the base protocol needs to address the issue
of email like identifiers. I would like to see that email like identifiers
are valid OpenID claimed id's.
So something like acct:example @ example.com should be a valid OpenID
claimed_id.

Also this discussion should not be in this thread (about attributes) and
maybe someone could start a new thread on this subject.

Thanks
Santosh


http://hi.im/santosh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20100511/bb04ec83/attachment.htm>