[WRAP] Wrap Artifact Binding/Mobile Profile

[John Bradley]

I agree that there is no practical use for the association handle if we have a per artifact secret.

That is why it may be useful to think of artefact as something not dependent on the existing redirect binding.

John B.
On 2010-02-16, at 6:34 PM, Allen Tom wrote:

> Hi John -
> 
> I was not suggesting that everyone use Artifact binding - presumably the OP
> will indicate that it supports Artifact binding in its discovery document,
> and it'll be up to the RP initiate the artifact request.
> 
> Also, regarding my previous proposal to ditch the association request for
> artifact binding - I concede that artifact binding is orthogonal to
> associations. 
> 
> However, if one of the goals of artifact binding is to shorten the size of
> the requests/responses, then eliminating the association handle would be
> consistent with this goal.
> 
> Allen
> 
> On 2/16/10 1:09 PM, "John Bradley" <ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com> wrote:
> 
>> We can't force everyone to do artifact.  We will still need to support
>> associations in RP's.
>> We cant just ditch the concept completely.
>> 
>