Attribute Exchange 2.0

[John Bradley]

I am in favour of this being international.

One reason for OIDs :)

Lots of people have taken runs at this over the years.

If people are serious about nailing down the semantics as well as the  
URI it may be worth the effort.

I will one up your Kantara with a OASIS WG.  That could go to the ISO/ 
ITU-T as well.

I am not opposed to Kantara but would like to draw out peoples opinions.

John B.


On 2009-09-16, at 9:05 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> MS an the US Gov agree on a place for this is as important as other  
> governments and telcos as well. ISO or ITU-T could be one place, but  
> that would be too heavy weight. Using a place like Kantara, which is  
> very light weight in starting a WG and has telco and other gov  
> participation, as an interim home towards ISO/ITU-T seem like a good  
> option to me.
>
> =nat
>
> John Bradley wrote:
>>
>> I have to say that this is the most interest I have seen in the  
>> topic for a while.
>>
>> I am a Kantara member as well.  However I know not everyone is 100%  
>> onboard with it being a neutral place.  Nat I know you try your  
>> best to achieve that.
>>
>> I would like to see everyone including MS and the US Gov agree on a  
>> place for this.
>>
>> That could be Kantara but I don't want to pre judge the sentiment.
>>
>> John B.
>> On 2009-09-16, at 8:38 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>>
>>> In Japan, we are starting the work to make a matching table for  
>>> selected SAML metadata (selected by Mobile Contents Forum: about  
>>> 600 of them) and OpenID AX schema. For this kind of thing, it is  
>>> quite important to involve telco as well, IMHO. In this regard, as  
>>> a forum, Kantara seems to be one of the good place to do.
>>>
>>> As to the URL, I prefer shorter one, but axschema.org does not  
>>> represent a short URL to me.
>>> Something akin of bit.ly etc. is much shorter. Having said that, I  
>>> am ok with axschema.org as well, if it can be transferred to an  
>>> international non-profit.
>>>
>>> =nat
>>>
>>> Breno de Medeiros wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So, is this a proposal to have axschemas.org blessed (perhaps by  
>>>> the OIDF)?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, John Bradley <john.bradley at wingaa.com 
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good point.  It would be nice to have one place to document  
>>>>> schema.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ICF has a claims dictionary as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we could consolidate that would be an improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do people have an opinion on trying to do something cross  
>>>>> protocol.
>>>>>
>>>>> openID, Information Cards, and SAML or should we do something on  
>>>>> our own.
>>>>>
>>>>> John B.
>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 5:22 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> axschema.org is shorter then schemas.openid.net and implies the
>>>>>> schemas could be used for things other then OpenID
>>>>>>
>>>>>> given that though, I don't have a strong preference
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use schemas.openid.net 
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that still the preferred option from your point of view,   
>>>>>>> or do
>>>>>>> you see axshema.org continuing in some way?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John B.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dick,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that  
>>>>>>>> anyone else
>>>>>>>> contributed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who controls axschema.org now?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do personally
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> specs mailing list
>>>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20090916/67ce2d6d/attachment.htm>