Attribute Exchange 2.0

[Nat Sakimura]

Hi John,

MS an the US Gov agree on a place for this is as important as other
governments and telcos as well. ISO or ITU-T could be one place, but
that would be too heavy weight. Using a place like Kantara, which is
very light weight in starting a WG and has telco and other gov
participation, as an interim home towards ISO/ITU-T seem like a good
option to me.

=nat

John Bradley wrote:
> I have to say that this is the most interest I have seen in the topic
> for a while.
>
> I am a Kantara member as well. However I know not everyone is 100%
> onboard with it being a neutral place. Nat I know you try your best to
> achieve that.
>
> I would like to see everyone including MS and the US Gov agree on a
> place for this.
>
> That could be Kantara but I don't want to pre judge the sentiment.
>
> John B.
> On 2009-09-16, at 8:38 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>
>> In Japan, we are starting the work to make a matching table for
>> selected SAML metadata (selected by Mobile Contents Forum: about 600
>> of them) and OpenID AX schema. For this kind of thing, it is quite
>> important to involve telco as well, IMHO. In this regard, as a forum,
>> Kantara seems to be one of the good place to do.
>>
>> As to the URL, I prefer shorter one, but axschema.org
>> <http://axschema.org> does not represent a short URL to me.
>> Something akin of bit.ly etc. is much shorter. Having said that, I am
>> ok with axschema.org <http://axschema.org> as well, if it can be
>> transferred to an international non-profit.
>>
>> =nat
>>
>> Breno de Medeiros wrote:
>>> So, is this a proposal to have axschemas.org <http://axschemas.org> blessed (perhaps by the OIDF)?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, John Bradley <john.bradley at wingaa.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Good point.  It would be nice to have one place to document schema.
>>>>
>>>> The ICF has a claims dictionary as well.
>>>>
>>>> If we could consolidate that would be an improvement.
>>>>
>>>> Do people have an opinion on trying to do something cross protocol.
>>>>
>>>> openID, Information Cards, and SAML or should we do something on our own.
>>>>
>>>> John B.
>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 5:22 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>> axschema.org <http://axschema.org> is shorter then schemas.openid.net <http://schemas.openid.net> and implies the
>>>>> schemas could be used for things other then OpenID
>>>>>
>>>>> given that though, I don't have a strong preference
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>> As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use schemas.openid.net <http://schemas.openid.net>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that still the preferred option from your point of view,  or do
>>>>>> you see axshema.org <http://axshema.org> continuing in some way?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> Dick,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents?
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that anyone else
>>>>>>> contributed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> Who controls axschema.org <http://axschema.org> now?
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> I do personally
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>         
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> specs mailing list
>>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20090916/01523940/attachment-0001.htm>