Attribute Exchange 2.0

[Henrik Biering]

Chris,
I called a session about this at the last IIW in May this year, but id 
did not attract much interest. The impression, that I got from this 
session and from other inputs is that the community in general wants to 
handle trust issues completely out of band (federated approach) - with 
PAPE as a partial exception to the rule.

Representing an OpenID provider with focus on identity proofing coupled 
with usercentricity and privacy (indeed a very tricky combination) I 
would be more than happy to have this discussion reopened - as we have 
examples where generic out of band OP-RP trust is clearly not acceptable 
to users.

Henrik Biering
=henrik
@netamia



Chris Obdam skrev:
> John, Allen,
>
> Thank you for your answers. With validation I mean the OpenID 
> Attribute Exchange Validate Mode.
> In this spec there's a validation required per attribute.
>
>> "openid.ax.validation.email=http://example.org/validation/token_via_email 
>>
>
> Are there already validation 'types', like 'token_via_email', 
> described in axschema (draft version?) or somewhere else?
> The AXSchema Google Group doesn't seem to be very active anymore.
>
> And of course: how can I help to start finalizing the draft? :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris Obdam
> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
>
>
> Op 15 sep 2009, om 19:43 heeft John Bradley het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Currently the AX 2.0 work is stalled.  I don't know of any other list.
>>
>> Sxip was driving it, but is no more.
>>
>> Some people are using schema form axshema and others are using URI 
>> from openid.org in AX 1.0.
>>
>> John B.
>> On 2009-09-15, at 12:07 PM, Chris Obdam wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Is there a different list for the discussion about Attribute 
>>> Exchange 2.0?
>>>
>>> A have some question regards that draft:
>>>
>>>     • What is the current state?
>>>     • Is there a axschema draft for using this version, especially 
>>> the validation part.
>>>     • We want to start validating in Holland with several large 
>>> (internet) companies. And we want to start using the validation bit. 
>>> Of course this is a draft, maybe we can participate in the discussion?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Chris Obdam
>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> specs mailing list
>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>