Requiring Pseudonymous Identifier

[Andrew Arnott]

Absolutely.  Now if we could only find an OP that actually supports it. (per
my thread on the general list) :)
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death
your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre


On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:24 PM, SitG Admin <sysadmin at shadowsinthegarden.com
> wrote:

>  If an RP only needs group membership and no individual identity, then why
>> assert an identifier at all?  Use OAuth or identity-less OpenID.  I think it
>> would seriously cloud OpenID's Identifiers if an AX attribute that may or
>> may not be noticed or included significantly changes what the identifier's
>> significant meaning is.
>>
>
> Good point. Is it possible to do identity-less OpenID without first
> establishing an identity, though?
>
> -Shade
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20090513/6776b4db/attachment.htm>