No subject

> The very legitimate question here is whether it is acceptable for the Ope=
nID spec to define that the query
> can be encoded in the fragment if a fragment is present in the return_to =
URL. If the spec were to say it is
> valid, then there is no incorrect behavior (as no other spec is otherwise=
 violated).

Yup, great point. We can just say that it is valid (as Google and Yahoo hav=
e implemented it today) thus blessing this as a potential optimization goin=
g forward.