[specs-pape] Typo in the PAPE spec?

[Paul Madsen]

are examples normative? If not, is an errata necessary?

Are there any plans for another PAPE version?

paul

John Bradley wrote:
> The normative text is correct.
>
> It was always openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types form Oct 2008 
> when it was added to draft 5.
> The bad example crept in in Draft 6 and went unnoticed.
>
> We will need to figure out a process for errata.
>
> Thanks for picking it up.
>
> John B.
> On 17-Jun-09, at 1:03 PM, Allen Tom wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In Section 5.1 of the PAPE Spec, there's a request parameter defined 
>> called
>>    openid.pape.preferred_auth_level_types
>>
>> however the example in the same section calls it
>>
>>    openid.pape.preferred_auth_levels
>>
>> Which one is it?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> _______________________________________________
>> specs-pape mailing list
>> specs-pape at openid.net
>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs-pape mailing list
> specs-pape at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs-pape
>