Request for consideration of AX 2.0 Working Group Charter Proposal

Raghu Nallani Chakravartula raghu at producthorizons.com
Tue Jan 27 05:25:40 UTC 2009


Futher, the verification information cannot sometimes be expressed in a 
single type.
It may need to be qualified with additional information as regards who 
verified it, when, how long is the verification valid etc...

I am guessing validation data exchange will need to grow into a struct 
exchange.

-Raghu

Paul Madsen wrote:
> FWIW, the separate 'verified' field is the approach the Infocard 
> community took
>
> https://informationcard.net/wiki/index.php/Claim_Catalog
>
> They also allow the particular verification method used to be listed
>
> https://informationcard.net/wiki/index.php/Claim_Catalog#Verification_Methods
>
> One drawback of this method is that all claims sent together get 
> lumped together into a single bucket wrt verification
>
> paul
>  
>
> Martin Atkins wrote:
>> Henrik Biering wrote:
>>> Agree!
>>> If the range of SReg attributes is expanded, however, I would 
>>> suggest to add phone number (incl. quality as suggested for email) 
>>> and possibly street+city address line(s). That would make it 
>>> possible to fill in a somewhat larger part of typical registration 
>>> forms.
>>>
>>
>> It might be good to apply the quality thing to all of the fields.
>>
>> One approach might be to add a "verified" argument that contains a 
>> list of names of fields that the OP has verified in some way.
>>
>> However, I think the SREG spec itself needs work done since the 1.1 
>> draft (that was never published) has a bunch of problems. It might be 
>> better to do such work in a separate working group; I already have an 
>> updated 1.1 draft with some of the problems from the current 1.1 
>> draft fixed that could potentially be used as a basis, though I'll 
>> need to dig it out since I'm not sure what I checked it in to.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> specs mailing list
>> specs at openid.net
>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Paul Madsen
> e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com
> p:613-482-0432
> m:613-282-8647
> web:connectid.blogspot.com
> ConnectID <http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/blogspot/gMwy/%7E6/1>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
>   



More information about the specs mailing list