Request for consideration of AX 2.0 Working Group Charter Proposal

[Martin Atkins]

Henrik Biering wrote:
> Agree!
> If the range of SReg attributes is expanded, however, I would suggest to 
> add phone number (incl. quality as suggested for email) and possibly 
> street+city address line(s). That would make it possible to fill in a 
> somewhat larger part of typical registration forms.
> 

It might be good to apply the quality thing to all of the fields.

One approach might be to add a "verified" argument that contains a list 
of names of fields that the OP has verified in some way.

However, I think the SREG spec itself needs work done since the 1.1 
draft (that was never published) has a bunch of problems. It might be 
better to do such work in a separate working group; I already have an 
updated 1.1 draft with some of the problems from the current 1.1 draft 
fixed that could potentially be used as a basis, though I'll need to dig 
it out since I'm not sure what I checked it in to.