Separation of Discovery from AuthN (was Proposal to form Discovery Working Group)

[Drummond Reed]

I'm just catching up on holiday mail and wanted to add another +1 to
separation of Discovery from AuthN. The sooner the better.

 

=Drummond 

 

  _____  

From: specs-bounces at openid.net [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf
Of David Fuelling
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 8:47 AM
To: Nat Sakimura
Cc: John Bradley; specs at openid.net
Subject: Re: Proposal to form Discovery Working Group

 

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura at nri.co.jp> wrote:

2. Separation of OP into Discovery Service and Authentication Service.
 In the current terminology, OP spans both Discovery Service and
Authentication Service.
 We should be explicit about it.


+1.  I would like to see discovery services separated from OP services too.
 



John Bradley wrote:
> Breno,
>
> I agree.  I recommended separating discovery into a separate doc for
> 2.1.
>
> There didn't seem to be support for the idea at the time,  perhaps
> circumstances have changed and the idea will be accepted now.
>
> Regards
> John Bradley
> =jbradley

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20090104/803667b3/attachment-0002.htm>