AX 2.0 Data model

[Dick Hardt]

On 2009-12-15, at 7:08 AM, Chris Obdam wrote:

Do we already have an inventorisation of what attributes and object should be included into the model? There have been many discussions, but I am losing grip. Maybe a Wiki? Where people can suggest needed attr next to what already is available on axschema.org<http://axschema.org/>

And what do we do wit axschema? There is the schema (formal) and the implementation (JSON, something else). Shouldn't we split these discussions?

Yes they are two different discussions. There is the message schema and the attributes that are being moved around.

At IWW there was a discussion about what AX could look like. The queries and responses need more syntax then is provided by simple name/value pairs. It is a little embarrassing looking at AX 1.0 now with the overloaded lvalue. XML and JSON are well understood syntaxes for rich objects. XML looks to have more power/complexity then needed, JSON looks just right.

-- Dick


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20091215/61167995/attachment.htm>