AX 2.0 Data model

[Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten]

There isn't even a working group yet, so no official discussion has  
begun. In theory, the working group and spec scope is still  
negotiable. But the real holdup seems to be an IPR issue that I no  
longer grasp. If there is some discussion elsewhere, I imagine it's  
happening in person.

To your original point, I'm really struggling to understand how to get  
namespaces into JSON, and everything I've found is either a terrible  
reincarnation of the HTML/RDFa/QNAME headache, or a one-to-one mapping  
with RDF or XML. Makes me want to research the TLS+RDF and SAML  
assertion tech, and I'm in no way comforted by that.

You don't happen to have a way to shove structured data into AX 1.0  
style types, do you?

On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Chris Obdam wrote:

> Discussions is still going on on the mailinglist, or somewhere else  
> too?
>
> Op 14 dec 2009, om 22:12 heeft Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten het  
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Dec 14, 2009, at 2:27 AM, Chris Obdam wrote:
>>> The AX 2.0 workgroup scope says :
>>>> Introduce the concept of more generic schema for sending/ 
>>>> requesting properties about attributes.
>>>
>>> Does that main embedding something like AX Schema.org into AX or  
>>> does it mean that a new schema should be created for requesting  
>>> properties?
>>> If the latter, is it possible to embed AXSchema into AX2? Or isn't  
>>> it the right spot?
>>
>> Consensus is leaning toward a JSON format compatible with PoCo. I  
>> can think of ways to embed AXSchema in there, but nothing I'd want  
>> to take the blame for.
>> --
>> j
>