OWASP Review
David Recordon
drecordon at sixapart.com
Mon Mar 10 19:01:37 UTC 2008
Hey James,
I suppose there could be merit, but my guess is that if you want it to
happen then you'll need to organize it.
--David
On Mar 10, 2008, at 1:38 PM, "McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)" <James.McGovern at thehartford.com
> wrote:
>
> Is there merit in having a third-party group such as OWASP
> (http://www.owasp.org) provide a third-party opinion that is public on
> the security of OpenID? Having large entities market OpenID will help
> spread the word even faster.
>
>
> ***
> **********************************************************************
> This communication, including attachments, is
> for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary,
> confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the
> intended
> recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or
> distribution is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> notify
> the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and
> destroy all copies.
> ***
> **********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
More information about the specs
mailing list