handling of url redirection

[John Panzer]

Aside from the depth issue, is there any distinction drawn between 301 
(permanent) or 302 (temporary) redirects in the OpenID specification? 

David Recordon wrote:
> Hi Marv,
> This has never been specified as a relying party could choose to  
> follow as many redirects as it wishes.  Maybe there should be a hard  
> line drawn though from an interoperability side?
>
> --David
>
> On Feb 17, 2008, at 3:06 PM, SignpostMarv Martin wrote:
>
>   
>> Was talking with keturn in #openid , and it seems that the spec
>> currently doesn't indicate how 30x redirects should be handled.
>>
>> More specifically, how deep an OpenID-enabled application should  
>> follow
>> redirects before giving up.
>>
>>
>> ~ Marv
>> _______________________________________________
>> specs mailing list
>> specs at openid.net
>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20080223/bd70865b/attachment-0001.htm>