Backporting the 2.0 extension mechanism to 1.1

[Johnny Bufu]

On 11/08/08 10:35 AM, Martin Atkins wrote:
> In that referenced section it says:
> 
>      For the purposes of this document *and when constructing OpenID 1.1
>      messages*, the extension namespace alias SHALL be "pape".
> 
> (emphasis mine)
> 
> I understand that to mean that when making a 1.1 request the alias must 
> be "pape".

You're right - my brain must have left out the portion you emphasized,
since it didn't use to be there.

I thought PAPE was not meant to be compatible with 1.1, exactly for the
reasons you outlined in the initial message.

Not sure what the best approach would be here: specify how PAPE could be
used with OpenID 1.1, or leave it as an incentive to upgrade to 2.0.

Johnny