PAPE Extension Specification

[David Recordon]

Great!  Let's try to publish Draft 2 of PAPE either later today or  
tomorrow morning.  Few more emails coming shortly on this stuff.

--David

On Oct 11, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Johnny Bufu wrote:

>
> On 8-Oct-07, at 8:20 AM, David Recordon wrote:
>
>>>> # On the same topic, I have suggested before and there seemed to be
>>>> # agreement[1] that it's more useful if auth_age in the response is
>>>> # actually a timestamp (auth_time).
>>>>
>>>> Ah, good point.  The spec didn't get changed; was there anything  
>>>> else
>>>> holding that up?
>>>
>>> Not that I know of; probably slipped off David's list.
>>
>> Yep, slipped my list.  I'm happy to have you guys (Jonathan and  
>> Johnny) write patches (and commit) to the spec things like this.   
>> I'll review commits and raise any issues I see.  I think this will  
>> be the fastest way to guarantee the spec is in the state you guys  
>> need for Barcelona.
>>
>> If not, I'll try to commit stuff this week.
>
> Great, that works. I'll check in updates that we have agreed on.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Johnny
>
>