PAPE Extension Specification (part 2)

Jonathan Daugherty cygnus at janrain.com
Tue Oct 9 17:08:48 UTC 2007


Hi all,

Here are a few more items.

Section 5.1

  - The spec doesn't specify what should be done in the absence of
    max_auth_age in a PAPE request.  I could assume, but it would be
    easy enough to specify, say, that the OP is to authenticate the
    user at its own discretion.

  - In my opinion, the third paragraph for max_auth_age (beginning
    "The OP should realize") is implicit.  I think it should be
    removed.

  - The preferred_auth_policies specification claims, "If multiple
    policies are requested, the OP SHALL try to satisfy as many as it
    can."  In terms of language strength, "SHALL try" is an oxymoron.
    Can we change this to "If multiple policies are requested, the OP
    SHOULD satisfy as many as possible"?

  - The preferred_auth_policies specification also states that "If no
    policies are requested, the RP is interested in other information
    such as the authentication age."  I think that is speculative and
    should be removed.  If it isn't removed, I think it should be
    moved to a section discussing the protocol flow more generally.

Thanks,

-- 
  Jonathan Daugherty
  JanRain, Inc.
  irc.freenode.net: cygnus in #openid
  cygnus.myopenid.com



More information about the specs mailing list