SREG namespace URI rollback

[Johnny Bufu]

On 1-Nov-07, at 12:06 PM, David Recordon wrote:
> Sorry it took me a few days, but seems alright to me.  I think a  
> larger question would be if there should be any material  
> differences with SREG 1.1 such as adding a few additional common  
> fields.

I believe Josh's argument back in April was that the URI should be  
the same exactly because there's no difference between 1.0 and 1.1  
(except the openid.ns field / OpenID 2.0 compatibility). Modifying  
the substance of it would invalidate this argument and require  
different namespaces to identify each.

I'm just an implementer here and I'm fine either way, just need to  
know what I can rely on.


Thanks,
Johnny