Specifying identifier recycling

[Johannes Ernst]

On May 30, 2007, at 13:28, Josh Hoyt wrote:
> After thinking this over for a while, I'm no longer convinced that
> using URI fragments as the uniquifying value is the right
> approach.

I agree with you. Our reasons may differ slightly, but the result is  
the same.

I have no problem in not solving this problem this time around. I  
would have a problem with adding a solution to the spec that turns  
out to not be a solution after all. ;-)

Cheers,


Johannes.



Johannes Ernst
NetMesh Inc.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openid-relying-party-authenticated.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 903 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20070530/f9759078/attachment-0004.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lid.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 973 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20070530/f9759078/attachment-0005.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
  http://netmesh.info/jernst