Proposal for Modularizing Auth 2.0 Discovery
Gavin Baumanis
gavin.baumanis at rmit.edu.au
Sat Mar 3 10:43:07 UTC 2007
--
Best regards,
Gavin Baumanis
T: +61 -3 992 51099
F: +61 -3 992 52706
E: gavin.baumanis at rmit.edu.au
Property Services
RMIT University
Level 6, 449 Swanston Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Australia
>>> On Saturday, March 03, 2007 at 17:26, in message
<c70bc85d0703022226i430eeaeei9618e39030ee56f2 at mail.gmail.com>, "Mark
Baker"
<distobj at acm.org> wrote:
<snip>
> I suggest just saying that any URI can be used, and let the
> community/market decide what actually gets used.
>
> Mark.
Sure, and (as is done already), provide appropriate examples and
perhaps even leave out (of the examples)
the contested ones.
Not saying they can't be used, but perhaps not advertising the
contentious ones either?
Who makes up the list of what is/isn't??? well the list, of course as
is always the case.
More information about the specs
mailing list