SREG namespace URI rollback

[Recordon, David]

I'm fine with keeping it 1.0 as Josh proposed.

--David


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnny Bufu [mailto:johnny at sxip.com]
Sent:	Saturday, April 07, 2007 09:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
To:	Recordon, David
Cc:	Josh Hoyt; OpenID specs list
Subject:	Re: SREG namespace URI rollback


On 2-Apr-07, at 6:06 PM, Recordon, David wrote:

> Sure, though I think there has also been a desire to do a bit of an

Are we in agreement then (about 1.0 and 1.1 sharing the same type URI)?

I went ahead and implemented SREG in openid4java, and exposed it in  
such a way that the users won't have to know about all these v1.0 /  
1.1 details. But in order for that to work and my implementation to  
be compliant, the type URI of SREG 1.1 needs to change as proposed by  
Josh in the next (final?) draft.

Thanks,
Johnny

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20070408/c1929a38/attachment-0002.htm>