Moving AX Forward (WAS RE: SREG namespace URI rollback)

[Johannes Ernst]

On Apr 6, 2007, at 10:21, Dick Hardt wrote:
> On 5-Apr-07, at 9:18 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
>
>> ... IMHO for simplicity sake of
>> reading the AX documents this format description should be merged  
>> into
>> the core protocol spec.  If down the road it should be split out
>> then it always can be.
>
> Well, as one of the people that wrote the documents. We decided that
> having separate documents was better. Thanks for sharing your
> opinion. I have a different opinion.

For somebody who currently doesn't have an opinion on this subject,  
could you briefly describe the rationale for your view?



Johannes Ernst
NetMesh Inc.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openid-relying-party-authenticated.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 903 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20070406/4a3c3ac7/attachment-0004.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lid.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 973 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20070406/4a3c3ac7/attachment-0005.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
  http://netmesh.info/jernst