SREG namespace URI rollback

Josh Hoyt josh at janrain.com
Mon Apr 2 20:17:03 UTC 2007


On 4/2/07, Johnny Bufu <johnny at sxip.com> wrote:
> I think the missing namespace in SREG1.0 can cause problems; take
> this example:

I was not proposing that we drop the namespace. Just that we don't
introduce a new URI when the protocol is otherwise identical, and
instead just use the existing type URI as a namespace URI.

That is, an SREG 1.1 request looks like:

openid.ns.s=http://openid.net/sreg/1.0&openid.s.nickname=j3h

not:

openid.sreg.nickname=j3h

If you use "sreg" as the namespace alias, SREG 1.1 is identical to SREG 1.0.

Is that clearer?



More information about the specs mailing list