Request for comments: Sorting fields in signature generation

Johnny Bufu johnny at
Wed Sep 27 21:35:44 UTC 2006

On 27-Sep-06, at 10:39 AM, Josh Hoyt wrote:
> On 9/27/06, Johnny Bufu <johnny at> wrote:
>> Section 5.2 of draft 9 seems to imply, at least, that pass-through
>> parameters are allowed, and specifies how the parties involved in the
>> transaction should handle the openid / non-openid parameters.
> Huh? I don't see anything in that section about a requirement to echo
> back parameters.

Not a requirement, but I read the second paragraph as implying they  
can/could be used.

If that weren't so, then why is there the "openid." prefix to the  
parameters in some of the messages?


More information about the specs mailing list