Request for comments: Sorting fields in signature generation -Call for votes
drummond.reed at cordance.net
Wed Sep 27 20:10:49 UTC 2006
-1 on multiple parameters with the same name.
From: specs-bounces at openid.net [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf
Of Josh Hoyt
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 12:20 PM
To: Marius Scurtescu
Cc: specs at openid.net
Subject: Re: Request for comments: Sorting fields in signature generation
-Call for votes
On 9/27/06, Marius Scurtescu <marius at sxip.com> wrote:
> please keep in mind that we are not asking for some fancy new
> technology or feature, just conformance with a very basic an wide
> spread convention of handling parameters in HTTP/HTML.
As Kevin pointed out, we are not working on the HTTP/HTML form
processing specification. We are working on an authentication
protocol. Restricting the protocol to forbid multiple parameters with
the same name does not break conformance with anything.
I think that we have discussed the majority of the technical issues
regarding multiple parameters with the same name. I could respond to
your individual points, but I don't think that would get us any closer
Can we get +1/-1 on multiple parameters with the same name from people
without @sxip.com or @janrain.com e-mail addresses?
Clearly, we (JanRain) are -1.
specs mailing list
specs at openid.net
More information about the specs