PROPOSAL: OpenID Form Clarification (A.4)

[Dick Hardt]

Missed that section. It is not clear what the return_to URL is though.

The return_to URL may not be the same thing as the action URL from  
the login form. What we wanted was the action URL since we want to  
POST openid_identifier=<OpenID URI> to that URL. This would be a  
different message then the indirect response message from the IdP  
which is signed etc.

I think this is the right direction, we just need to clarify more  
what that end point is.

-- Dick


On 19-Oct-06, at 11:21 AM, Recordon, David wrote:

> Which is still described in the latest draft, see
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0-10.html#anchor42.
>
> --David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: specs-bounces at openid.net [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On
> Behalf Of Josh Hoyt
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: Dick Hardt
> Cc: specs at openid.net
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: PROPOSAL: OpenID Form Clarification (A.4)
>
> On 10/19/06, Dick Hardt <dick at sxip.com> wrote:
>> I like your proposal. I would tweak the name:
>>
>> <link rel="openid.entry" href="http://my.rp.com/openid/blah.cgi">
>
> This is what Yadis was designed for. Since OpenID already requires
> Yadis, this should be implemented as a Service entry in the Yadis
> document for any page on which you want that information.
>
> Josh
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
>
>