PROPOSAL: OpenID Form Clarification (A.4)

[Pete Rowley]

Jonathan Daugherty wrote:
> # we already know that browser-chrome plugins will be supporting
> # OpenID - as soon as an RP picks some other field name, he'll get a
> # flood of complains from users who can't log in to his site.
>
> And that has nothing to do with the *protocol*.  Put it in a Best
> Practices document instead.  Or create an OpenID Rich Client
> specification.
>
>   
This is true only if you never consider use cases for your protocol 
which cover usability. That would be unwise. I don't think I know of a 
protocol that was developed without regard to how it would be used.


-- 
Pete

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20061019/bedc964b/attachment-0002.bin>