Summarizing Where We're At
Drummond Reed
drummond.reed at cordance.net
Tue Oct 17 03:57:13 UTC 2006
My votes on three issues (0 on everything else):
Consolidated Delegation Proposal
* -1 on status quo (draft 10)
* +1 on two-identifier
Change default session type
* +1
Bare request
* +1
=Drummond
-----Original Message-----
From: specs-bounces at openid.net [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf
Of Recordon, David
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 3:24 PM
To: Josh Hoyt; specs at openid.net
Subject: RE: Summarizing Where We're At
And here are my votes:
Request nonce and name
* Take no action
Authentication age
* -1, write as an extension first
Remove setup_url
* 0 for removing, +1 for asking feedback from implementers
Consolidated Delegation Proposal
* -1 on status quo (draft 10)
* 0 on single-identifier
* +1 on two-identifier
Change default session type
* +1
Bare request
* 0
--David
-----Original Message-----
From: joshhoyt at gmail.com [mailto:joshhoyt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Josh
Hoyt
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 11:21 AM
To: Recordon, David
Cc: specs at openid.net
Subject: Re: Summarizing Where We're At
Here are my reactions to what's outstanding:
On 10/15/06, Recordon, David <drecordon at verisign.com> wrote:
> * Request Nonce and Name
> - Has been partially implemented, openid.nonce ->
> openid.response_nonce, no agreement on the need of a request nonce
> specifically, rather discussion has evolved into allowing a RP to pass
> "appdata" like in Yahoo's BBAuth. No formal proposal on the table
> yet, thus will not be included in this version.
Take no action
> * Authentication Age
> - Re-proposed today adding clarity in motivation, general consensus
> is needed to add to specification.
-1
> * Remove setup_url
> - Little discussion and no general consensus to do so. Rather seems
> asking for feedback from checkid_immediate implementers on the
> parameter would be beneficial at this time.
+1
> * Consolidated Delegation Proposal
> - Very active discussion, the only proposal I'm willing to stall the
> spec for. Seems very important a strong conceptual model is created
> at this time.
-0 on status quo (draft 10)
+0 on single-identifier
+1 on two-identifier
> * Change Default session_type
> - Proposed, no discussion yet.
Will address in separate message
> * Bare Request
> - Proposed, no discussion yet.
-0 (YAGNI)
Josh
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
More information about the specs
mailing list